My Reflection on Media

My relationship with media has been changed, as I see more of the positive aspects in being connected to the world. As a teenager, I am constantly exposed to media, as it is all around us whether we like it or not. This causes to me to consciously and unconsciously conform to the ideas of my peers and popular figures in media to and be aware of current trends. Overall, being aware of techniques that big name companies and advertisers use to attract such a large audience is helpful for me to consider things with a grain of salt and to constantly question the true intentions.

As my first post about my relationship of media stated that media has more negative effects than positive effects on people, I am leaning towards the positive side, thinking that media helps others stay connected and measure themselves to their peers and the rest of the world. This semester, I have noticed that I did not heavily rely on as much media as I have before. Instead, I catch myself analyzing actions of media in order to see what the true intentions are that lie underneath the surface. It's important to have media literacy to become aware of techniques and patterns that are ever-present in our lives in the twenty-first century, a modern and technologically advanced era. With media literacy, there is self-awareness in peoples' actions, like consuming products that are heavily advertised in media. Being media literate and an educated consumer helps the world as a whole grow, as well as to prevent an individual from being manipulated and shaped by media.

Overall, this blog has opened my eyes to schemes and techniques that advertisers and companies do in order to money. Additionally, this media blog assignment has caused me to look for patterns and trends in media, keeping me updated on social norms in media. Keeping this blog has caused me to become more media literate, allowing me to view things with an open-mind and from multiple perspectives. Media literacy is extremely important for a person to survive in this world, especially when this world is engulfed with advanced technology and revolves around influential companies such as Apple, Microsoft, and many more media outlets.

Rio Olympics 2016

While the 2016 Rio Olympics is anticipated to happen this summer, it may not be the best time to do so. In response to the highly anticipated 2014 World Cup, the country experienced controversial success in an exciting tournament. The drawback to the 2014 World Cup was ultimately what was going on behind the scenes. Ultimately, the problem with Brazil hosting the 2016 summer Olympics is that they are trying to use a short-term solution for a deep problem within their country. The rationalization behind is that it's not hurting anyone directly by hosting the Olympics. However, by using most of the country's resources to fund a sporting extravaganza like the Olympics, it shows that the country justifies itself to spend a lot of money on stuff that could be used for better interests of the country.

The disparity and wealth gap between the rich and poor has been a crucial problem in maintaining a stable economy. In addition, a struggle to find cultural identity for the lower class has always been a problem. While a temporary solution to the problem was to "white-wash" most of Brazil, it did not ensure long-term success. Before the 2014 World Cup that was hosted by Brazil, neighborhoods in shantytowns were raided and people were essentially arrested for simply living there. The government did this in order to "clean up" and "whiten" the atmosphere for the incoming tourists and spectators visiting for the World Cup.

The fact that the World Cup may have been a success for the organization and provided a temporary solution to the country's problems through tourism and revenue, hosting events like the Olympics and World Cups are not a great way to build a stable economy. Underneath the superficial surface of the Olympics that may seem spectacular, there is a large gap between the rich and poor as well as a large majority of the population are young, poor, and unemployed. In the end, hosting these world events will only lead to more problems with the country as the rationalization is that it's not unethical because it doesn't harm people directly, 

Brian Banks and Brock Turner: Ever-Present Wealth and Race Privileges

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3630119/Brian-Banks-wrongfully-convicted-rape-teen-cites-privilege-Stanford-rape-case.html

http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/brock-turner-the-sort-of-defendant-who-is-spared-severe-impact/10288

Recently, I have stumbled across two compelling cases in relation to rape. The first is about a White Stanford swimmer, Brock Allen Turner, who raped an intoxicated woman in a frat party, behind a dumpster. He is currently sentence to six months in jail. The other case I read about showed a Black football player, Brian Banks, who did not go to a prestigious university as Stanford, but was convicted and forced to serve five years in prison for rape that he did not commit. Both of these incidents are horrid, but in different ways.

Brian Banks

The five years that was taken away from Banks's life cannot be returned. By giving such a lenient, short sentence for Turner, it is a disgrace of the justice system. This blatantly conveys the effects of privilege based on wealth and race. 

These cases illustrate not only privilege from race, but also of wealth privileges. While Brian Banks served six years for a crime he did not commit, Brock Allen Turner was charged to go to prison for up to six months. The judge's reasoning behind was to spare "severe impact" for Turner. This reasoning is  unjustified, as the sentencing is obviously biased in favor for Turner. People should not be treated differently because they are more well-endowed than their peers or they are of different ethnicity. If another person who did not fit the demographics of Brock Turner was convicted of the rape, the punishment would not be spared because of "severe impact." The fact that a White Division 1 swimmer was spared time from prison because it would be "too harsh" on him, shows the privileges present in the justice system. If this was not a White Stanford swimmer, I wonder if the consequences would be different.

Brock Turner

The gap between race and wealth is incredible between these two cases. On one side, you have Brian Banks who was originally convicted to 41 years to life in prison for rape that he was accused of in high school. The recent case for Turner is minuscule compared to that of Banks, only up to six months. The father of Brock Turner stated that his son should not be incarcerated because "he had no prior criminal history and has never been violent with anyone." This statement does not hold water because by committing a rape on a student, that person is violating another's right to their body and taking advantage of an intoxicated person. This lenient sentencing for Turner is a danger to the world, as the justice system does not do a well enough job to punish a him.

Portrayal of Ethnic Minorities in the Media

After watching Merchants of Cool and Miss Representation, I have realized the power that media has on easily influencing individuals in our society. Through exposure to movies and television, I feel like there are definite stereotypes in today's society that are influenced by the media, causing people to expect others to be a certain way when they simply are not. For example, shows like How I Met Your Mother is an example of a group of friends that relates to the common people. While it may be more for a mature audience than teenagers our age, it is well-known and has a large fan base. More importantly, How I Met Your Mother has arguably five main characters-- all of them are White. Popular movies and television shows often have White protagonists, and when there are other ethnic groups like African-American, Asian, or Hispanic, they are usually "white-washed" or appeal to American stereotypes. This shows the lack of representation or perhaps misconceptions of minorities in media.

The ultimate consequences by having limited representatives on different ethnic groups in media are in fact, negative. While there are both positive and negative stereotypes about minority groups, both create expectations for individuals affecting their ability to identify and fit in to society. Even if the stereotype is positive such as that Asian-Americans are geniuses or African-Americans are good at basketball, it still affects individuals in a negative way because if you are of that ethnicity but do not fit the stereotype, it is hard to fit in.

These stereotypes tend to allow people in today's society to view others under a single story, assuming that people can be categorized based on their ethnicity. Not only does this affect judgment of people, but it causes a lack of identity within individuals affected by these stereotypes. If people are exposed to media that reinforce these stereotypes of individuals, it encourages people to act a certain way in society, instead of expressing who they truly are.

Merchants of Cool: Mooks and Midriffs

In response to watching Merchants of Cool, I have learned that companies view human beings as essential customers, especially affluent teenagers that are willing to spend money to fit in. To target their audience, these companies create stereotypes like "midriffs" and "mooks." These stereotypes are infectious for teenage boys and girls, as human beings conform to what they experience on television and the internet. Today, we see social extremes for both men and women in media that we are exposed to. The reason I feel like these stereotypes are created are to make teenagers more marketable and exposed to products that reinforce these stereotypes. For example, violent video games may appeal to teenage boys that have been exposed to the notion that violence is masculine from examples from the media like the "mook." The same can be said for "midriffs," as Britney Spears is an example that was brought up from Merchants of Cool. Spears was portrayed as hyper-feminine and sexually charged, appealing to the "midriff" stereotypes that enables advertisers to easily market specific articles of clothing to teenage girls. Therefore, the creation of stereotypes like "mooks" are beneficial for other companies to sell their product to appeal to a mass of teenagers that follow most characteristics of a single stereotype.

"mook"

"midriff"

In the end, marketers target teenagers for their money and see them as walking advertisers. When a friend wears a special brand of a company, their friends deep down are accustomed to that brand. In addition social extremes for teenagers are seen to be "mooks" and "midriffs," encouraging teenagers to be a superficial stereotype influenced by the media. In addition to the fact that creation of stereotypes from media that is exposed to us has a negative impact on our social patterns as a society, it ironically suggests that companies own and run the country behind the scenes.

Are They Really Worth It?

Throughout many years of school, I have noticed that appearance matters. Unfortunately, many times people catch themselves stereotyping others and inferring peoples' personalities from how they look or what they wear. Particularly, the way that people dress is an easy way for others to distinguish social statuses. Marketers and companies know this--and that is why certain brands are created to appeal to an impressionable group of people, kids.

Many brands like Diamond Co. are marketed to teenagers who are willing to be different. The need for autonomy is present, as more and more companies are marketing their brands and products to make their consumers feel different, ultimately to make easy money. While the intention for Diamond is to be a skater shirt, many wear this shirt as a status symbol. In order to be "cool," the creator of this product wants the consumers to feel as if they are a step ahead of others by buying their product. By buying Diamond, people believe they can stand out, or be part of a popular clique. As people continue to buy the shirt, it potentially creates a cult mentality that encourages others to fit in with their friends and to buy that product. In the end, I question why spending 30 dollars for a T-Shirt is really worth it.

Diamond is just an example, as they are a brand that clearly has success in marketing their products by virtually portraying a status symbol on their product, which is their brand. Other brands that do this well are Nike and Gatorade, both companies heavily rely on their brand name to attract consumers. The simple logos and slogans speak for themselves, they want others to buy their products because of the success of others (like athletes) that many impressionable teenagers admire.

 I am personally guilty of sporting many pairs of Nike Elite socks when I was in sixth to eighth grade. The reason I wore them was simply because my friends were wearing them-- and wearing them made me feel more cool and athletic, exactly what Nike wanted me to feel. Consumerism for these products by well-known products are evident throughout media and in real life.

After watching Merchants of Cool, I have noticed that lately, fashions are constantly changing and whatever is cool right now, may not be the case in a few years. For example, there are patterns where specific products are extremely popular for a short amount of time. I feel like this tells us a lot about our modern culture. It shows that achieving the concept of "cool," is unattainable, especially if one sees being "cool" is by fitting in or intentionally being different (being a hipster). I believe that the solution is to be aware that undeniably, appearance does matter. However, people should not stress whether they are "cool" by what brands they sport, but other aspects like the content of their character.  

Silly Bands

Print Ad Analysis: Progressive

In this print ad, Flo from Progressive uses repetition in a word bubble illustrated above her head to persuade the audience to invest in Snapshot, a device that records your vehicle identification number, how many miles you drive during the day, and how often you drive between midnight and 4.a.m. In addition, she states that "good drivers should be rewarded-- that's why we created snapshot." This quote implies the need to feel safe as by investing Snapshot, drivers will be able to monitor threats; ultimately being in a state of security.

The main part of the advertisement that is "With Snapshot, great drivers get great savings. However, great triangle players will still go unrecognized." This ad uses repetition with the word "great" to imply that investing in a product like snapshot will mean that you are a great driver and a responsible person. However, if you do not, you will be unrecognized and not important. She compares this to a triangle player. She uses an analogy by implying that however great a triangle player can be, the player will go unrecognized. This is similar to how in this ad, a great driver will also go unrecognized, unless he/she buys and uses Snapshot.

Overall, by using repetition of the word great, subtle need to feel safe, and a popular mascot like Flo from Progressive, Progressive Auto Insurance advertises their product, Snapshot.