My relationship with media has been changed, as I see more of the positive aspects in being connected to the world. As a teenager, I am constantly exposed to media, as it is all around us whether we like it or not. This causes to me to consciously and unconsciously conform to the ideas of my peers and popular figures in media to and be aware of current trends. Overall, being aware of techniques that big name companies and advertisers use to attract such a large audience is helpful for me to consider things with a grain of salt and to constantly question the true intentions.
As my first post about my relationship of media stated that media has more negative effects than positive effects on people, I am leaning towards the positive side, thinking that media helps others stay connected and measure themselves to their peers and the rest of the world. This semester, I have noticed that I did not heavily rely on as much media as I have before. Instead, I catch myself analyzing actions of media in order to see what the true intentions are that lie underneath the surface. It's important to have media literacy to become aware of techniques and patterns that are ever-present in our lives in the twenty-first century, a modern and technologically advanced era. With media literacy, there is self-awareness in peoples' actions, like consuming products that are heavily advertised in media. Being media literate and an educated consumer helps the world as a whole grow, as well as to prevent an individual from being manipulated and shaped by media.
Overall, this blog has opened my eyes to schemes and techniques that advertisers and companies do in order to money. Additionally, this media blog assignment has caused me to look for patterns and trends in media, keeping me updated on social norms in media. Keeping this blog has caused me to become more media literate, allowing me to view things with an open-mind and from multiple perspectives. Media literacy is extremely important for a person to survive in this world, especially when this world is engulfed with advanced technology and revolves around influential companies such as Apple, Microsoft, and many more media outlets.
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Wednesday, June 8, 2016
Rio Olympics 2016
While the 2016 Rio Olympics is anticipated to happen this summer, it may not be the best time to do so. In response to the highly anticipated 2014 World Cup, the country experienced controversial success in an exciting tournament. The drawback to the 2014 World Cup was ultimately what was going on behind the scenes. Ultimately, the problem with Brazil hosting the 2016 summer Olympics is that they are trying to use a short-term solution for a deep problem within their country. The rationalization behind is that it's not hurting anyone directly by hosting the Olympics. However, by using most of the country's resources to fund a sporting extravaganza like the Olympics, it shows that the country justifies itself to spend a lot of money on stuff that could be used for better interests of the country.
The disparity and wealth gap between the rich and poor has been a crucial problem in maintaining a stable economy. In addition, a struggle to find cultural identity for the lower class has always been a problem. While a temporary solution to the problem was to "white-wash" most of Brazil, it did not ensure long-term success. Before the 2014 World Cup that was hosted by Brazil, neighborhoods in shantytowns were raided and people were essentially arrested for simply living there. The government did this in order to "clean up" and "whiten" the atmosphere for the incoming tourists and spectators visiting for the World Cup.
The fact that the World Cup may have been a success for the organization and provided a temporary solution to the country's problems through tourism and revenue, hosting events like the Olympics and World Cups are not a great way to build a stable economy. Underneath the superficial surface of the Olympics that may seem spectacular, there is a large gap between the rich and poor as well as a large majority of the population are young, poor, and unemployed. In the end, hosting these world events will only lead to more problems with the country as the rationalization is that it's not unethical because it doesn't harm people directly,
Brian Banks and Brock Turner: Ever-Present Wealth and Race Privileges
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3630119/Brian-Banks-wrongfully-convicted-rape-teen-cites-privilege-Stanford-rape-case.html
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/brock-turner-the-sort-of-defendant-who-is-spared-severe-impact/10288
Recently, I have stumbled across two compelling cases in relation to rape. The first is about a White Stanford swimmer, Brock Allen Turner, who raped an intoxicated woman in a frat party, behind a dumpster. He is currently sentence to six months in jail. The other case I read about showed a Black football player, Brian Banks, who did not go to a prestigious university as Stanford, but was convicted and forced to serve five years in prison for rape that he did not commit. Both of these incidents are horrid, but in different ways.
These cases illustrate not only privilege from race, but also of wealth privileges. While Brian Banks served six years for a crime he did not commit, Brock Allen Turner was charged to go to prison for up to six months. The judge's reasoning behind was to spare "severe impact" for Turner. This reasoning is unjustified, as the sentencing is obviously biased in favor for Turner. People should not be treated differently because they are more well-endowed than their peers or they are of different ethnicity. If another person who did not fit the demographics of Brock Turner was convicted of the rape, the punishment would not be spared because of "severe impact." The fact that a White Division 1 swimmer was spared time from prison because it would be "too harsh" on him, shows the privileges present in the justice system. If this was not a White Stanford swimmer, I wonder if the consequences would be different.
The gap between race and wealth is incredible between these two cases. On one side, you have Brian Banks who was originally convicted to 41 years to life in prison for rape that he was accused of in high school. The recent case for Turner is minuscule compared to that of Banks, only up to six months. The father of Brock Turner stated that his son should not be incarcerated because "he had no prior criminal history and has never been violent with anyone." This statement does not hold water because by committing a rape on a student, that person is violating another's right to their body and taking advantage of an intoxicated person. This lenient sentencing for Turner is a danger to the world, as the justice system does not do a well enough job to punish a him.
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/brock-turner-the-sort-of-defendant-who-is-spared-severe-impact/10288
Recently, I have stumbled across two compelling cases in relation to rape. The first is about a White Stanford swimmer, Brock Allen Turner, who raped an intoxicated woman in a frat party, behind a dumpster. He is currently sentence to six months in jail. The other case I read about showed a Black football player, Brian Banks, who did not go to a prestigious university as Stanford, but was convicted and forced to serve five years in prison for rape that he did not commit. Both of these incidents are horrid, but in different ways.
These cases illustrate not only privilege from race, but also of wealth privileges. While Brian Banks served six years for a crime he did not commit, Brock Allen Turner was charged to go to prison for up to six months. The judge's reasoning behind was to spare "severe impact" for Turner. This reasoning is unjustified, as the sentencing is obviously biased in favor for Turner. People should not be treated differently because they are more well-endowed than their peers or they are of different ethnicity. If another person who did not fit the demographics of Brock Turner was convicted of the rape, the punishment would not be spared because of "severe impact." The fact that a White Division 1 swimmer was spared time from prison because it would be "too harsh" on him, shows the privileges present in the justice system. If this was not a White Stanford swimmer, I wonder if the consequences would be different.
Brock Turner |
Tuesday, May 31, 2016
Portrayal of Ethnic Minorities in the Media
After watching Merchants of Cool and Miss Representation, I have realized the power that media has on easily influencing individuals in our society. Through exposure to movies and television, I feel like there are definite stereotypes in today's society that are influenced by the media, causing people to expect others to be a certain way when they simply are not. For example, shows like How I Met Your Mother is an example of a group of friends that relates to the common people. While it may be more for a mature audience than teenagers our age, it is well-known and has a large fan base. More importantly, How I Met Your Mother has arguably five main characters-- all of them are White. Popular movies and television shows often have White protagonists, and when there are other ethnic groups like African-American, Asian, or Hispanic, they are usually "white-washed" or appeal to American stereotypes. This shows the lack of representation or perhaps misconceptions of minorities in media.
The ultimate consequences by having limited representatives on different ethnic groups in media are in fact, negative. While there are both positive and negative stereotypes about minority groups, both create expectations for individuals affecting their ability to identify and fit in to society. Even if the stereotype is positive such as that Asian-Americans are geniuses or African-Americans are good at basketball, it still affects individuals in a negative way because if you are of that ethnicity but do not fit the stereotype, it is hard to fit in.
These stereotypes tend to allow people in today's society to view others under a single story, assuming that people can be categorized based on their ethnicity. Not only does this affect judgment of people, but it causes a lack of identity within individuals affected by these stereotypes. If people are exposed to media that reinforce these stereotypes of individuals, it encourages people to act a certain way in society, instead of expressing who they truly are.
The ultimate consequences by having limited representatives on different ethnic groups in media are in fact, negative. While there are both positive and negative stereotypes about minority groups, both create expectations for individuals affecting their ability to identify and fit in to society. Even if the stereotype is positive such as that Asian-Americans are geniuses or African-Americans are good at basketball, it still affects individuals in a negative way because if you are of that ethnicity but do not fit the stereotype, it is hard to fit in.
These stereotypes tend to allow people in today's society to view others under a single story, assuming that people can be categorized based on their ethnicity. Not only does this affect judgment of people, but it causes a lack of identity within individuals affected by these stereotypes. If people are exposed to media that reinforce these stereotypes of individuals, it encourages people to act a certain way in society, instead of expressing who they truly are.
Merchants of Cool: Mooks and Midriffs
In response to watching Merchants of Cool, I have learned that companies view human beings as essential customers, especially affluent teenagers that are willing to spend money to fit in. To target their audience, these companies create stereotypes like "midriffs" and "mooks." These stereotypes are infectious for teenage boys and girls, as human beings conform to what they experience on television and the internet. Today, we see social extremes for both men and women in media that we are exposed to. The reason I feel like these stereotypes are created are to make teenagers more marketable and exposed to products that reinforce these stereotypes. For example, violent video games may appeal to teenage boys that have been exposed to the notion that violence is masculine from examples from the media like the "mook." The same can be said for "midriffs," as Britney Spears is an example that was brought up from Merchants of Cool. Spears was portrayed as hyper-feminine and sexually charged, appealing to the "midriff" stereotypes that enables advertisers to easily market specific articles of clothing to teenage girls. Therefore, the creation of stereotypes like "mooks" are beneficial for other companies to sell their product to appeal to a mass of teenagers that follow most characteristics of a single stereotype.
In the end, marketers target teenagers for their money and see them as walking advertisers. When a friend wears a special brand of a company, their friends deep down are accustomed to that brand. In addition social extremes for teenagers are seen to be "mooks" and "midriffs," encouraging teenagers to be a superficial stereotype influenced by the media. In addition to the fact that creation of stereotypes from media that is exposed to us has a negative impact on our social patterns as a society, it ironically suggests that companies own and run the country behind the scenes.
"mook" |
"midriff" |
Tuesday, May 24, 2016
Are They Really Worth It?
Throughout many years of school, I have noticed that appearance matters. Unfortunately, many times people catch themselves stereotyping others and inferring peoples' personalities from how they look or what they wear. Particularly, the way that people dress is an easy way for others to distinguish social statuses. Marketers and companies know this--and that is why certain brands are created to appeal to an impressionable group of people, kids.
Diamond is just an example, as they are a brand that clearly has success in marketing their products by virtually portraying a status symbol on their product, which is their brand. Other brands that do this well are Nike and Gatorade, both companies heavily rely on their brand name to attract consumers. The simple logos and slogans speak for themselves, they want others to buy their products because of the success of others (like athletes) that many impressionable teenagers admire.
Many brands like Diamond Co. are marketed to teenagers who are willing to be different. The need for autonomy is present, as more and more companies are marketing their brands and products to make their consumers feel different, ultimately to make easy money. While the intention for Diamond is to be a skater shirt, many wear this shirt as a status symbol. In order to be "cool," the creator of this product wants the consumers to feel as if they are a step ahead of others by buying their product. By buying Diamond, people believe they can stand out, or be part of a popular clique. As people continue to buy the shirt, it potentially creates a cult mentality that encourages others to fit in with their friends and to buy that product. In the end, I question why spending 30 dollars for a T-Shirt is really worth it.
Diamond is just an example, as they are a brand that clearly has success in marketing their products by virtually portraying a status symbol on their product, which is their brand. Other brands that do this well are Nike and Gatorade, both companies heavily rely on their brand name to attract consumers. The simple logos and slogans speak for themselves, they want others to buy their products because of the success of others (like athletes) that many impressionable teenagers admire.
I am personally guilty of sporting many pairs of Nike Elite socks when I was in sixth to eighth grade. The reason I wore them was simply because my friends were wearing them-- and wearing them made me feel more cool and athletic, exactly what Nike wanted me to feel. Consumerism for these products by well-known products are evident throughout media and in real life.
After watching Merchants of Cool, I have noticed that lately, fashions are constantly changing and whatever is cool right now, may not be the case in a few years. For example, there are patterns where specific products are extremely popular for a short amount of time. I feel like this tells us a lot about our modern culture. It shows that achieving the concept of "cool," is unattainable, especially if one sees being "cool" is by fitting in or intentionally being different (being a hipster). I believe that the solution is to be aware that undeniably, appearance does matter. However, people should not stress whether they are "cool" by what brands they sport, but other aspects like the content of their character.
Silly Bands |
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
Print Ad Analysis: Progressive
In this print ad, Flo from Progressive uses repetition in a word bubble illustrated above her head to persuade the audience to invest in Snapshot, a device that records your vehicle identification number, how many miles you drive during the day, and how often you drive between midnight and 4.a.m. In addition, she states that "good drivers should be rewarded-- that's why we created snapshot." This quote implies the need to feel safe as by investing Snapshot, drivers will be able to monitor threats; ultimately being in a state of security.
The main part of the advertisement that is "With Snapshot, great drivers get great savings. However, great triangle players will still go unrecognized." This ad uses repetition with the word "great" to imply that investing in a product like snapshot will mean that you are a great driver and a responsible person. However, if you do not, you will be unrecognized and not important. She compares this to a triangle player. She uses an analogy by implying that however great a triangle player can be, the player will go unrecognized. This is similar to how in this ad, a great driver will also go unrecognized, unless he/she buys and uses Snapshot.
Overall, by using repetition of the word great, subtle need to feel safe, and a popular mascot like Flo from Progressive, Progressive Auto Insurance advertises their product, Snapshot.
The main part of the advertisement that is "With Snapshot, great drivers get great savings. However, great triangle players will still go unrecognized." This ad uses repetition with the word "great" to imply that investing in a product like snapshot will mean that you are a great driver and a responsible person. However, if you do not, you will be unrecognized and not important. She compares this to a triangle player. She uses an analogy by implying that however great a triangle player can be, the player will go unrecognized. This is similar to how in this ad, a great driver will also go unrecognized, unless he/she buys and uses Snapshot.
Overall, by using repetition of the word great, subtle need to feel safe, and a popular mascot like Flo from Progressive, Progressive Auto Insurance advertises their product, Snapshot.
A Basketball Game Commentated by Key and Peele
In addition, Key and Peele add that the athletes are genetically advantaged as they say that the players are "sweaty legal giants, 7 feet tall, and genetic freak." This shows that basketball players are more naturally gifted, leading up to their success in sports instead of hard work.
Not only are the athletes being criticized, but the society as a whole. Meanwhile, the commentators also fire shots at the audience by stating that "50,000 fans that are ready to binge-drink" are in the stadium, showing the negative connotation of the psychographics behind sports fans. Since this is a parody of a basketball game, these two comedians make a parody of all the participants of sports culture: athletes and fans alike.
This comedic skit was a tool to entertain viewers as well as allow others to be aware of certain blandness and routine that happens in sports. I think the overall message that Key and Peele are trying to convey is whether today's societies are spending too much time investing themselves in a sport. As a person who loves watching sports, I think that while it is not acceptable to paint an entire sports culture in a negative way based on stereotypes, people need to consider the certain repercussions and aspects from their sport.
Tuesday, May 10, 2016
Coca-Cola: Brotherly Love
In examination of lovemarks in marketing strategies, this advertisement by Coca-Cola associates the feeling of a sense of family--more importantly brotherhood, when drinking Coca-Cola. Even though the intent of this advertisement is to ultimately sell soda, the advertisement satisfies many peoples' needs for companionship. In the documentary, The Persuaders, it explains the clever ways that companies are marketing their product. In this case, a lovemark is demonstrated by appealing to consumers through intertwining brotherhood and Coca-Cola. This advertisement for Coca-Cola seems like it simply shows the common relationship between two brothers. In reality, this advertisement utilizes its enticing music and alluring setting to transplant a feeling of intimacy when drinking Coca-Cola.
When watching this advertisement, I feel calm and relaxed, as if the intent was more to create an emotional attachment to drinking soda, rather than buying it. This commercial is one of many that builds a long-term relationship between the consumer and the product. This clever advertisement mixes together feelings of intimacy and happiness while drinking Coca-Cola. This is a great example of a lovemark because it evokes emotions towards the audience whenever they drink Coca-Cola. After watching this commercial, not only does drinking a refreshing glass of Coca-Cola during a hot summer day sound great, but being with a companion, particularly a family member or brother is closely bonded with Coca-Cola.
2014 World Cup Commercial
"Winners Stay On" Nike Commercial
In preparation of the highly anticipated 2014 World Cup, Nike released a commercial with a multitude of famous athletes. This commercial takes place in an ordinary soccer field, ultimately transforming into a packed and loud stadium. This advertisement demonstrates the need to achieve as well as the need for attention. Starting out as a pick-up football game, teenage boys dressed in Nike gear transform into famous soccer players. Each of them flaunt their individual skills and score some nice-looking goals. The use of well-known soccer players like Ronaldo and Neymar to attract the audience shows the need to achieve, as in competition, these players strive for victory in an exciting manner. The teenagers in this commercial seem impressionable and fans of soccer, furthering the need to achieve, as they all look up to these athletes, wishing to be like them.
In preparation of the highly anticipated 2014 World Cup, Nike released a commercial with a multitude of famous athletes. This commercial takes place in an ordinary soccer field, ultimately transforming into a packed and loud stadium. This advertisement demonstrates the need to achieve as well as the need for attention. Starting out as a pick-up football game, teenage boys dressed in Nike gear transform into famous soccer players. Each of them flaunt their individual skills and score some nice-looking goals. The use of well-known soccer players like Ronaldo and Neymar to attract the audience shows the need to achieve, as in competition, these players strive for victory in an exciting manner. The teenagers in this commercial seem impressionable and fans of soccer, furthering the need to achieve, as they all look up to these athletes, wishing to be like them.
In addition to the need for achieve, this advertisement demonstrates the need for attention because of the environment that the commercial takes in as. When the players are playing in the stadium, it is the same environment of a match in the World Cup. The flashing lights and roaring audience give the impression that all eyes are on the players. After all, these are not only athletes, but also celebrities as they garner attention from the media and are incredibly influential to the youth. The interaction in the commercial between the youngsters and the athletes further demonstrate the appeal for the youth to feel like they can be just like the professionals.
Tuesday, May 3, 2016
Loaded Language
5/3/16
Huffington Post Link
I chose two different media sources covering the same story about Ted Cruz dropping out of the 2016 presidential race. By comparing a conservative article from Fox News and a liberal one from Huffington Post, there is a noticeable difference between the way that Cruz and the republican party are seen in these posts. On the side with the Huffington post, the unpopular statements of Cruz are highlighted as they mention "the opposition of gay marriage on the basis of religious freedom." This shows words that demonstrate the lack of sympathy for a conservative former-candidate that Huffington Post is probably not fond of. By using this phrase, they condemn Cruz about his unpopular opinion that led to his resignation from the presidential race.
Fox News Link
In the article about Ted Cruz with Fox News, the article states that there was a "bitter and personal clash" between Cruz and Trump. Fox News would want to talk about the rivalry between the two candidates instead of the unpopular statements that Cruz had said, which caused him to be dropped out since nobody wants to support him. This is an important shift to other competitors in the Republican party as more and more people continue to dislike Trump. The fact that there are no companies that want to sponsor Cruz shows the lack of support, leading to his resignation from the presidential race.
Overall, these two different websites are covering the same stories, but cover different details of the event. With Fox News, a conservative website, they continue to highlight the clash between Trump and Cruz, but also continue the best interests of the Republican party. On the other hand, Huffington Post is more on the liberal side, so this blog talked about the faults that Cruz had. This further separated the rift between liberals and conservatives.
Huffington Post Link
I chose two different media sources covering the same story about Ted Cruz dropping out of the 2016 presidential race. By comparing a conservative article from Fox News and a liberal one from Huffington Post, there is a noticeable difference between the way that Cruz and the republican party are seen in these posts. On the side with the Huffington post, the unpopular statements of Cruz are highlighted as they mention "the opposition of gay marriage on the basis of religious freedom." This shows words that demonstrate the lack of sympathy for a conservative former-candidate that Huffington Post is probably not fond of. By using this phrase, they condemn Cruz about his unpopular opinion that led to his resignation from the presidential race.
Fox News Link
In the article about Ted Cruz with Fox News, the article states that there was a "bitter and personal clash" between Cruz and Trump. Fox News would want to talk about the rivalry between the two candidates instead of the unpopular statements that Cruz had said, which caused him to be dropped out since nobody wants to support him. This is an important shift to other competitors in the Republican party as more and more people continue to dislike Trump. The fact that there are no companies that want to sponsor Cruz shows the lack of support, leading to his resignation from the presidential race.
Overall, these two different websites are covering the same stories, but cover different details of the event. With Fox News, a conservative website, they continue to highlight the clash between Trump and Cruz, but also continue the best interests of the Republican party. On the other hand, Huffington Post is more on the liberal side, so this blog talked about the faults that Cruz had. This further separated the rift between liberals and conservatives.
Meet the Hoopers
5/3/16
Meet the Hoopers - State Farm
In this State Farm commercial, five well-known NBA players are family members in a dysfunctional household. This NBA family is characterized into a prototypical family consisting of a grandfather, mother, father, son, and baby. The names of the NBA stars in order are Kevin Garnett, Deandre Jordan, Chris Paul, Kevin Love, and Damian Lillard. What makes this commercial so successful is it's use of humor and popularity of the NBA stars to attract attention from the audience. The Hoopers uses inside jokes within the NBA such as not being able to win championships. In basketball, "rings" are gained by winning championships -- so the more the better. In one of the episodes "Robbed" when the family loses their rings, which is ironic because all players in the family have not won a championship yet except the grandfather, Kevin Garnett. Using humor like this keeps the fans entertained in a clever way, while sneakily advertising State Farm.
By cleverly using the popularity of the NBA stars, it is a win-win situation for the NBA organization and the players. The organization obviously makes money in partnership with State Farm, who uses the commercial to advertise their home insurance. For these NBA stars, they gain popularity by being seen as relatable and a comic belief to the audience, enhancing their image that many look up to. In addition to humor, this advertisement also conveys the sense of unity, togetherness, and family when watching NBA basketball. By watching a series of The Hoopers, I was entertained and automatically looked forward to watch the NBA playoffs, showing the power of advertisement through clever marketing that appeals to the consumers.
Meet the Hoopers - State Farm
In this State Farm commercial, five well-known NBA players are family members in a dysfunctional household. This NBA family is characterized into a prototypical family consisting of a grandfather, mother, father, son, and baby. The names of the NBA stars in order are Kevin Garnett, Deandre Jordan, Chris Paul, Kevin Love, and Damian Lillard. What makes this commercial so successful is it's use of humor and popularity of the NBA stars to attract attention from the audience. The Hoopers uses inside jokes within the NBA such as not being able to win championships. In basketball, "rings" are gained by winning championships -- so the more the better. In one of the episodes "Robbed" when the family loses their rings, which is ironic because all players in the family have not won a championship yet except the grandfather, Kevin Garnett. Using humor like this keeps the fans entertained in a clever way, while sneakily advertising State Farm.
By cleverly using the popularity of the NBA stars, it is a win-win situation for the NBA organization and the players. The organization obviously makes money in partnership with State Farm, who uses the commercial to advertise their home insurance. For these NBA stars, they gain popularity by being seen as relatable and a comic belief to the audience, enhancing their image that many look up to. In addition to humor, this advertisement also conveys the sense of unity, togetherness, and family when watching NBA basketball. By watching a series of The Hoopers, I was entertained and automatically looked forward to watch the NBA playoffs, showing the power of advertisement through clever marketing that appeals to the consumers.
Tuesday, April 26, 2016
My Relationship with Media
My current relationship with media stems from our society's demand on information being circulated around the internet. By knowing that media is defined by "the means of mass communication (especially radio, television, newspaper, and internet)," I probably cannot go a day without not encountering media around the world. Without knowledge of what is going on in the world, which is obtained through the exposure of media, life would not necessarily be bad, but simple. By immersing ourselves in the media, it further expands our knowledge of the world, as well as potentially creating a more sociable environment. However, there are some ways that the consumption of the media could be used in a negative manner.
Others as well as myself have probably found ourselves procrastinating on that important homework assignment until the night before it was due. By being obsessed with social media, accompanied with the heavy workload of a high schooler involved in extracurricular activities, it is easy for us to justify ourselves to easily check out from reality, plugging ourselves in to social media devices. There may be an instant gratification, but the ultimate consequence is the fact that media also has a negative influence on its users. That negative influence is the inability to concentrate on a single task, rendering teenagers like myself to be distracted easily and care too much about things that do not matter much. Ultimately, media is a double-edged sword that can do more harm than good unless utilized correctly and responsibly.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)